Intrinsic and tumor-induced JAK/STAT signaling regulate developmental timing by the <i>Drosophila</i> prothoracic gland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Development involves tightly paced, reproducible sequences of events, yet it must adjust to conditions external to it, such as resource availability and organismal damage. A major mediator of damage-induced immune responses in vertebrates and insects is JAK/STAT signaling. At the same time, JAK/STAT activation by the Drosophila Upd cytokines is pleiotropically involved in normal development of multiple organs. Whether inflammatory and developmental roles of JAK/STAT intersect is unknown. Here, we show that JAK/STAT is active during development of the prothoracic gland (PG), the organ that controls metamorphosis onset through ecdysone production. Reducing JAK/STAT signaling decreased PG size and slightly advanced metamorphosis. Conversely, JAK/STAT hyperactivation, achieved through overexpression of pathway components or SUMOylation loss, caused PG hypertrophy and metamorphosis delay. Interestingly, tissue damage and tumors, known to secrete Upd cytokines, also activated JAK/STAT in the PG and delayed metamorphosis. Finally, we show that expression of transcription factor Apontic, a JAK/STAT target in the PG, recapitulates PG hypertrophy and metamorphosis delay. JAK/STAT damage signaling, therefore, regulates metamorphosis onset at least in part by coopting its developmental role in the PG. Summary statement Damage signaling from tumors mediated by JAK/STAT-activating Upd cytokines delays the Drosophila larva-pupa transition through cooption of a JAK/STAT developmental role in the prothoracic gland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".