MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3170357314 · doi:10.1109/ojvt.2021.3085421

Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Energy Efficient Multi-UAV Data Collection for IoT Networks

2021· article· en· W3170357314 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceReinforcement learningData collectionReal-time computingWireless sensor networkMarkov decision processEnergy consumptionScheduleScheduling (production processes)Distributed computingArtificial intelligenceMarkov processComputer networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are regarded as an emerging technology, which can be effectively utilized to perform the data collection tasks in the Internet of Things (IoT) networks. However, both the UAVs and the sensors in these networks are energy-limited devices, which necessitates an energy-efficient data collection procedure to ensure the network lifetime. In this paper, we propose a multi-UAV-assisted network, where the UAVs fly to the ground sensors and control the sensor's transmit power during the data collection time. Our goal is to minimize the total energy consumption of the UAVs and the sensors, which is needed to accomplish the data collection mission. We formulate this problem into three sub-problems of single UAV navigation, sensor power control as well as multi-UAV scheduling and model each part as a finite-horizon Markov Decision Process (MDP). We deploy deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based frameworks to solve each part. Specifically, we use deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) method to generate the best trajectory for the UAVs in an obstacle-constraint environment, given its starting position and the target sensor. We also deploy DDPG to control the sensor's transmit power during data collection. To schedule activity plans for each UAV to visit the sensors, we propose a multi-agent deep Q-learning (DQL) approach by taking the total energy consumption of the UAVs on each path into account. Our simulations show that the UAVs can find a safe and optimal path for each of their trips. Continuous power control of the sensors achieves better performance over the fixed power approaches in terms of the total energy consumption during data collection. In addition, compared to the two commonly used baselines, our scheduling framework achieves better and near-optimal results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it