Initial results from a first in human trial incorporating accelerated dose titration of a novel immune stimulating oncolytic virus - VG161.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e14574 Background: Oncolytic virus (OV) can specifically replicate in cancer cells causing cell lysis. Together with the expression of immune stimulating payloads, OV can induce an anti-tumor immune response. The aim of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability, and PK profile of VG161, a novel HSV-1 OV armed with IL12, IL15 with its receptor α unit, and PD-L1 antagonist (Fc-fused 14 amino acid peptide), after single intra-tumoral injection (IT) in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. Methods: This is an open label, single-arm, accelerated titration design pilot trial. Based on preclinical NOAEL, the first cohort dose level was calculated as 5×10 7 /subject, followed with 2 cohorts (1×10 8 and 2×10 8 PFU), 1-3 patients per cohort. One patient was treated in each cohort and the subsequent cohorts were initiated only after the safety observation of the current cohort was completed (21 days) with no DLT and no > 2 moderate toxicity events deemed possibly, probably, or definitely related to VG161, otherwise, it would be expanded per the 3+3 design. DNA copy number of VG161 was measured with qPCR in the tumor biopsy and blood, in urine for virus shedding, as well as swabs of injection site and mouth. Immune cytokines were measured with MSD assay (electrochemiluminescence detection) in blood. Peripheral lymphocyte subsets were analyzed with flowcytometry. Results: Three patients (1 per cohort) were treated and completed safety observation. No DLT, and 10 AEs (fever, low neutrophils and lymphocytes, etc.) were possibly, probably, or definitely related. Grade 3 fever was the only related SAE, which recovered in 3 days. Dose dependent increase of VG161 DNA copy was detected in the tumor 2-3 days after treatment (C-max: 10, 1000, and 1000000 times increase from low to high dose), in contrast, it remained undetectable in blood, oral swab, and urine. Virus DNA was detected in injection site swab for the patient at the highest dose level but not for those treated at lower dose levels. After dosing, increases of IL-12 (C-max: 2.0, 2.4, and 21 times of baseline), IL-15 (C-max: 1.6, 3.2, and 2.5 times of baseline), IFN-γ (C-max: 49, 638, and 236 times of baseline) and TNF-α (C-max: 2.3, 3.7, and 2.2 times of baseline) from low to high dose were seen. Peripheral lymphocyte subset analysis and immune profiling of injected tumor are ongoing. Interestingly, partial regression of multiple visible non-injected lesions was observed in 1 patient shortly after dosing, however no durable direct or abscopal responses were seen to date. Conclusions: Single IT injection of VG161 up to 2×10 8 PFU/subject is safe and well tolerated, with no unexpected viral spread or shedding. The post-dose increase in cytokines and the transit regression of non-injected lesions imply the activation of anti-cancer immunity induced by VG161. This holds potential for further dose optimization to assess the safety and efficacy. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12620000244909.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".