MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Linear Stochastic Control with Transfer Functions

2016· other· en· W3170560024 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas J. Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueWiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceControl chartProcess (computing)Control (management)Statistical process controlProcess controlQuality (philosophy)Stochastic controlControl engineeringTransfer functionControl theory (sociology)Optimal controlMathematical optimizationEngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Control charts, cusums, exponentially weighted‐moving averages and Shewhart schemes are traditional methods used for industrial quality control. These methods may be used to ascertain when a process is in statistical control and to visualize patterns and abnormal events. These methods do not provide a comprehensive strategy for controlling a process to a target value. Stochastic control theory provides a unified framework for the design of controllers for industrial processes. By employing a model for the process dynamics and disturbances, very flexible control algorithms can be designed. The presence of serially correlated observations, inherent in many industrial processes, and delays associated with analytical measurements are incorporated in the control strategy. These algorithms are specifically designed to control the process variable at its target value. In this article, the basic elements of stochastic control are reviewed, an example is used to illustrate the methodology, and references provided to applications in quality control and process monitoring and assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference OnlineSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207