MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3170579364 · doi:10.2144/btn-2020-0164

Apoptosis Assessment in High-Content and High-Throughput Screening Assays

2021· article· en· W3170579364 on OpenAlexafffund
Céline Rens, Tirosh Shapira, Sandra Peña‐Díaz, Joseph D. Chao, Tom Pfeifer, Yossef Av‐Gay

Bibliographic record

VenueBioTechniques · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTerminal deoxynucleotidyl transferaseApoptosisTUNEL assayHigh-content screeningHigh-throughput screeningIn Situ Nick-End LabelingBiologyMolecular biologyIntracellularMycobacterium tuberculosisThroughputComputational biologyCell biologyTuberculosisBiochemistryCellComputer sciencePathologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here the authors describe the development of AUTOptosis, an economical and rapid apoptosis monitoring method suitable for high-content and high-throughput screening assays. AUTOptosis is based on the quantification of nuclei intensity via staining with Hoechst 33342. First, the authors calibrated the method using standard apoptosis inducers in multiple cell lines. Next, the authors validated the applicability of this approach to high-content screening using a small library of compounds and compared it with the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling gold standard. Finally, the authors demonstrated the specificity of the method by using AUTOposis to detect apoptosis triggered by Mycobacterium tuberculosis intracellular infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioTechniquesSame topicCell Image Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207