MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Epidemiology, clinical features, and histopathology of sarcomas managed in a Haitian cancer clinic.

2021· article· en· W3170586961 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Bernard, Thierry Alcindor, Lynn Gabrielle Alexis, Doukens Patrick Gilbert, Vincent DeGennaro

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSarcomaRhabdomyosarcomaLeiomyosarcomaCancer registryDermatofibrosarcoma protuberansEpidemiologyHistopathologyLiposarcomaSoft tissue sarcomaCancerRetrospective cohort studySurgeryInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e23515 Background: Sarcomas are among the least described cancers diagnosed in Haiti. Suboptimal surgery and the unavailability of radiation therapy make their management challenging. The main objective of this study was to present the epidemiology, clinical features and histopathology of sarcomas in the Haitian setting. Methods: A seven-year retrospective study was conducted in the cancer program of Innovating Health International (IHI). We included all patients with clinical or histological diagnosis of sarcoma enrolled from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2020. Date of first visit, age, gender, stage, anatomical site, histology, outcome as of December 31, 2020 and date of death were the main variables selected for this chart review. Mortality rate and overall survival were also evaluated. Results: One hundred and twenty-two (122) patients with sarcomas were diagnosed and treated during the study period. Their mean age was 43.3 years [range: 15-88] and the sample was 62.3% women and 37.7% men. 49.2% of the patients were less than 40 years of age. Among the cases of sarcomas, 86.9% were soft tissue sarcomas and 13.1% bone sarcomas. The lower limbs (36.9%), abdomen (14.8%), head and neck (13.1%), upper limbs (12.3%) and breasts (7.4%) were the most common locations of the sarcomas. 81% of abdominal/pelvic sarcoma cases (n=21) were in women. The most common histological types (n=94) were fibrosarcoma (15.2%), liposarcoma (10.9%), dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (8.7%), malignant histiocytofibroma (6.5%), rhabdomyosarcoma (5.4%) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (5.4%). 19.6% of the patients had metastatic disease. The mortality rate for the study period was 53.3% and 17.2% of the patients were lost to follow-up. The median overall survival was 7.2 months for the cohort and 18.4 months for the treated patients (n=70). Conclusions: The sarcomas seen in this Haitian medical clinic mainly affect the soft tissues of limbs, abdomen and head and neck. There is a strong predominance of female patients and about half of the patients are aged less than 40. Despite a low metastatic presentation rate, the prognosis is poor, likely reflecting both the aggressiveness of this group of diseases and the disparities of outcomes between high-income and low-and-middle-income countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.252
GPT teacher head0.542
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→