MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3170623454 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20015256

Assessing the Associations Among Facility Design and Management Practices and Drug Use in Ontario Free-Stall Dairy Herds

2001· article· en· W3170623454 on OpenAlexaffabout
D. Léger, D.F. Kelton, K. Lissemore, S.W. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary medicine and infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiosecurityAnimal husbandryBusinessSanitationFood safetyAgricultureHerdBiotechnologyAgricultural scienceEnvironmental healthOperations managementEnvironmental planningMedicineEngineeringVeterinary medicineGeographyBiologyEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, issues centered on drug use in food producing animals have emerged as major food safety concerns in this agricultural sector. The dairy industry must adopt practical management strategies that minimize drug use in cattle. These strategies need to be identified and must focus on husbandry practices and facility design that minimize animal stress, and that contain specific biosecurity, sanitation and nutritional recommendations to minimize disease-and therefore drug use-in food animals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicVeterinary medicine and infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207