(Auto)destrucción, una deriva sadeana: Bosquejo de la lógica filosófico-política del republicanismo neoliberal
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we are going to propose an interpretative framework about the philosophical-political logic that comprises the capture of the republic (res publica) by neoliberalism. Although, it would not be only a capture but a new creation that we will call "neoliberal republicanism". To begin, we will establish an equivalence with the fundamental philosophical-political problem (Deleuze / Guattari), which will allow us to investigate what it is that leads subjects to fight for their own (self) destruction as if it were their freedom. Along these lines, we will expose a possible conceptual relationship around neoliberalism (Lordon, Laval / Dardot, Alemán, Foucault), through which we will introduce a connection between Hobbes and Sade, which will allow us to explore the philosophical-political logic of “this perversion of gregarious desire” that, in neoliberalism, we call neofascism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it