MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of Electromagnetic Field Radiation at 2300 MHz on Wistar Rats

2020· article· en· W3170705749 on OpenAlexaff
Bhushanam Kasukurthi, VedParkash Sharma, Ramkesh Dalal, Harpreet Kaur, M Ushakiranmayi, Dindial Ramotar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Punjab Academy of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectromagnetic fieldRadiationField (mathematics)Veterinary medicinePhysicsBiologyMedicineMathematicsOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: In the past decades, mobile phones have been increasing the amount of non-ionizing radiations in the form of high electromagnetic field radiations (EMFr) in all of our living surroundings and believed to cause tissue injuries in both animals and plants. Many studies now are exploring the consequences of cellular phone EMFr on physical and chemical changes in animals. Materials and Methods: We conducted experiments to study the biochemical consequences of 2300 MHz EMFr on wistar rats. Thirty six male albino adults were randomly divided into three sets and each set divided into test and control groups (Each group n=6, total six groups). The set I, II and III groups with controls were exposed to 2300 MHz irradiation for one hour per day according to their body weights for 30, 50 and 70 days, respectively. Blood serum was collected for all the groups to monitor for protein diminution and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity. Results: Our data revealed that exposure to the irradiation caused significant ALP levels, which increased at >50 and >70 days. The exposed animals showed modest changes in the protein and ALP levels as well as reduced body weights. There were significant deviations observed in physiological parameters of the exposed animals such as food and water intake and body temperature when compared to the controls. Conclusions: This study raised the possibility that constant usage of mobile phones likely to cause other abnormal tissue related problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Punjab Academy of Forensic Medicine & ToxicologySame topicElectromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsFrench-language works237,207