Mild Idiopathic Infantile Hypercalcemia—Part 2: A Longitudinal Observational Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: Idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia (IIH) is an uncommon disorder with variable clinical features. The natural history and response to dietary calcium and vitamin D restriction in IIH remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe the clinical and biochemical response to dietary calcium and vitamin D restriction in a genetically characterized cohort of mild IIH. METHODS: This is a longitudinal, observational cohort study of 20 children with mild IIH monitored for a median of 21months. Biochemical measures, dietary assessment, and yearly renal ultrasound results, since the time of diagnosis, were obtained and assessed prospectively every 4 to 6 months. RESULTS: Median age at initial diagnosis was 4.5 months. Median levels of serum calcium (2.82 mmol/L) and 1,25 (OH)2D (192 pmol/L) were elevated, whereas serum PTH was reduced (10 ng/L). Urinary calcium:creatinine ratio was elevated for some, but not all individuals (median 1.49 mmol/mmol). All patients who were managed with a low-calcium diet showed an improvement in serum and urinary calcium measures, but the serum concentration of 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) and 1,25(OH)2D/PTH ratio remained elevated. In 2 of the 11 subjects, renal calcification worsened. There were no differences in response between individuals with CYP24A1 or SLC34A1/A3 variants. CONCLUSION: The clinical presentation of mild IIH is variable, and dietary calcium and vitamin D restriction does not consistently normalize elevated 1,25(OH)2D concentrations or prevent worsening of renal calcification in all cases. Therapeutic options should target the defect in vitamin D metabolism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".