MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Acute exercise stimulates AMPK and corrects some disease characteristics in the skeletal muscle of myotonic dystrophy type 1 mice

2021· article· en· W3170766142 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexander Manta, Sean Y. Ng, Andrew I. Mikhail, Mark Mackie, Vladimir Ljubicic

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMyotonic dystrophySkeletal muscleAMPKEndocrinologyInternal medicineMuscular dystrophyMedicineWastingDuchenne muscular dystrophyBiologyProtein kinase ACell biologyKinase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myotonic Dystrophy type I (DM1) is the most prevalent adult form of muscular dystrophy and is characterized by myotonia, skeletal muscle weakness and wasting. The disease pathogenesis is characterized by a CTG microsatellite repeat expansion, leading to the dysregulation of pre‐messenger RNA splicing of numerous muscle genes. There is currently no cure for this disorder, but recent evidence indicate that exercise is a safe and modestly effective therapy. AMP‐activated protein kinase (AMPK) is critical to the acute responses and chronic adaptations to physical activity at the cellular and molecular level in the healthy condition, as well as in various disease states. However, the AMPK‐signaling response to exercise in DM1 remains largely unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine whether a single bout of exercise 1) activates AMPK and its downstream signalling network in DM1 skeletal muscle, and 2) modulates the DM1 molecular signature. Wild‐type (WT) and HSA‐LR (DM1) mice ran on a motor‐driven treadmill until the inability to continue exercise was objectively determined, and the molecular response to physical activity at various timepoints post‐exercise was examined using Western blotting, immunofluorescence microscopy, and qPCR techniques. WT mice ran for 937.6 ± 193.8 meters, which was significantly greater than DM1 mice at 573.3 ± 181.4meters. In the skeletal muscle of WT mice, AMPK activation status was significantly augmented immediately after exercise. This coincided with an increase (p < 0.05) in peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ coactivator‐1α (PGC‐1α) transcript levels, as well as significant elevations in unc‐51‐like kinase 1 (ULK1) and calcium/calmodulin‐dependent protein kinase type 2β (CAMKIIβ) activation. In DM1 mice, acute exercise also significantly stimulated AMPK, however, PGC‐1α, ULK1 and CAMKIIβ were unaffected. In resting muscle, several markers related to autophagy downstream of AMPK, for example ULK1 activation status, p62 protein level, and the lipidated form of microtubule‐associated protein 1‐light chain 3, were significantly elevated in DM1 mice compared to their WT counterparts. These normalized after exercise. Acute physical activity did not impact either the prevalence of toxic myonuclear foci formed by the CTG microsatellite repeat or the proportion of mis‐spliced muscle‐specific chloride channel in DM1 mice. Collectively, these results indicate that while exercise‐induced AMPK phosphorylation was preserved in the skeletal muscle of DM1 mice, markers of upstream and downstream AMPK signalling were attenuated in response to acute physical activity. Nonetheless, our data also suggest that exercise‐evoked AMPK activation normalizes perturbations in the autophagy pathway observed in DM1 muscle. Thus, skeletal muscle AMPK stimulation after a single bout of exercise is very likely necessary but insufficient to elicit beneficial structural and functional adaptations in DM1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases→French-language works237,207→