MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3170773358

Liberalizing Research in Science and Technology: Studies in Science Policy — Conference Report, Kanpur, India

2010· article· en· W3170773358 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Binay Kumar Pattnaik

Bibliographic record

VenueСоциология науки и технологий · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Productivity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaPolitical scienceEconomic growthSocial scienceGeographySocioeconomicsSociologyLawEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The international conference held at IIT Kanpur February 4 th –6 th, 2009 was co-organized by Dr. Binay K. Pattnaik (Convener) and Dr. Nadia Asheulova. 52 papers were presented over three days by scholars from six countries:India, Russia, Mexico, China, USA and Canada. The largest contingent of foreign delegates was from the Russian Federation. After welcoming the participants on Feb 4 th 2009 morning, the Convener spelled out the Conference rationale and objectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.012
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueСоциология науки и технологийSame topicEconomic Growth and ProductivityFrench-language works237,207