MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3170847021 · doi:10.2196/28292

Improving Human Happiness Analysis Based on Transfer Learning: Algorithm Development and Validation

2021· article· en· W3170847021 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lele Yu, Shaowu Zhang, Yijia Zhang, Hongfei Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHappinessArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceAgency (philosophy)SocialityMachine learningEncoderNatural language processingPsychologyCognitive psychologySocial psychologySociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Happiness refers to the joyful and pleasant emotions that humans produce subjectively. It is the positive part of emotions, and it affects the quality of human life. Therefore, understanding human happiness is a meaningful task in sentiment analysis. OBJECTIVE: We mainly discuss 2 facets (Agency/Sociality) of happiness in this paper. Through analysis and research on happiness, we can expand on new concepts that define happiness and enrich our understanding of emotions. METHODS: This paper treated each happy moment as a sequence of short sentences, then proposed a short happiness detection model based on transfer learning to analyze the Agency and Sociality aspects of happiness. First, we utilized the unlabeled training set to retrain the pretraining language model Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and got a semantically enhanced language model happyBERT in the target domain. Then, we got several single text classification models by fine-tuning BERT and happyBERT. Finally, an improved voting strategy was proposed to integrate multiple single models, and "pseudo data" were introduced to retrain the combined models. RESULTS: The proposed approach was evaluated on the public dataset happyDB. Experimental results showed that our approach significantly outperforms the baselines. When predicting the Agency aspect of happiness, our approach achieved an accuracy of 0.8653 and an F1 score of 0.9126. When predicting Sociality, our approach achieved an accuracy of 0.9367 and an F1 score of 0.9491. CONCLUSIONS: By evaluating the dataset, the comparison results demonstrated the effectiveness of our approach for happiness analysis. Experimental results confirmed that our method achieved state-of-the-art performance and transfer learning effectively improved happiness analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningFrench-language works237,207