Funciones ejecutivas y religiosidad/espiritualidad en el envejecimiento cognitivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction. Various studies have found a positive relationship between religiosity/spirituality and cognition in aging; notwithstanding, there are few studies about the specific relationship between religiosity/spirituality and executive function. Aim. To analyze the association between religious/spiritual dimensions and components from executive function. Subjects and methods. 92 healthy participants were assessed (> 60 years) with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment - Basic, the Frontal Assessment Battery, the Duke University Religion Index and the Spirituality, Religiousness and Personal Beliefs Field from the Quality of Life instrument of the World Health Organization. Results. Executive functions were negatively correlated with organizational religiosity (r=-0.24; p=0.02), most notably the component 'conceptualization' (r=-0.21; p=0.05). Executive functions were also negatively correlated with spiritual dimension 'hope and optimism' (r=-0.21; p=0.05), in particular the ‘inhibitory control’ (r=-0.26; p=0.01). Conclusion. Participation in religious meetings is negatively associated with executive functions in healthy aging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".