MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Breast Cancer Processes Are Modulated by Platelet‐Derived Microparticles

2021· article· en· W3170952111 on OpenAlexafffund
Vanessa Veilleux, Ève Mallet Gauthier, Jean‐Luc Jougleux, Luc H. Boudreau, Gilles A. Robichaud

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsAtlantic Cancer Research InstituteUniversité de Moncton
FundersNew Brunswick Innovation FoundationFondation de la recherche en santé du Nouveau-BrunswickLeukemia and Lymphoma Society of Canada
KeywordsInternalizationBreast cancerCancer researchMetastasisCancerFlow cytometryCancer cellMetastatic breast cancerPlatelet activationPlateletChemistryMedicineCellImmunologyInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cancer is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide. Although mortality rates have been declining for years, metastasis accounts for the majority of deaths associated with the disease. An increasing number of studies show that platelets as well as platelet‐derived microparticles (PMPs) play a significant role in cancer malignancy and disease progression. PMPs are small vesicles released into the circulatory system and the extracellular environment during platelet activation. PMP generation involves a process where bioactive material is transferred from platelets to the PMPs. Interestingly, PMPs have the capacity to interact with target recipient cells and transfer their bioactive cargo into these cells upon internalization. Accordingly, studies have shown that PMPs allow intercellular exchange and trafficking of bioactive material to modulate signaling and activation processes of recipient cells. We believe that PMPs represent an important source of breast cancer modulators leading to malignant features and disease progression. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of PMPs on breast cancer processes. More specifically, we investigated the modulating effects of PMPs on breast cancer metabolism and phenotypic processes involved in breast cancer metastasis. First, we characterized and validated the capacity of breast cancer models to internalize PMPs and their cargo using confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. Interestingly, we observed that the levels of PMPs internalization vary and are dependent of the type of breast cancer recipient cells. Using a series of biochemical and cell‐based assays, we also demonstrated that the cargo of PMPs is biologically active which results in the modulation of breast cancer cell metabolism, viability and migration properties of recipient cells. Overall, we demonstrate that PMPs modulate cancer cell processes reminiscent of disease malignancy. These findings provide a better understanding of the role of PMPs and their influence as cancer disease modulators. The knowledge gained from these studies will thus foster the development of potentially new strategic interventions to help mitigate the morbidity and mortality associated with cancer disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207