Joint Subchannel Allocation and Power Control in Licensed and Unlicensed Spectrum for Multi-Cell UAV-Cellular Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the resource and interference management problem in a novel scenario where multiple unmanned aerial vehicle base stations (UAV-BSs) provide cellular services to UAV users (UAV-UEs) by reusing both licensed and unlicensed spectrum. Considering the co-existence of terrestrial cellular, WiFi and UAV-BSs, a joint optimization problem is formulated for both subchannel allocation and power control of UAV-UEs over the licensed/unlicensed spectrum in order to maximize the uplink sum-rate of the multi-cell UAV-cellular network. Since the formulated problem is NP-hard, we decompose it into three sub-problems. Specifically, we first use the convex optimization and the Hungarian algorithm to obtain the global optimal of power and subchannel allocations in the licensed spectrum, respectively. Then, we propose a matching game with externalities and coalition game algorithms to obtain the Nash stable of the subchannel allocation in the unlicensed band. Local optimal power assignment in the unlicensed spectrum is obtained using the successive convex approximation (SCA) method. An iterative algorithm is thereby developed to solve the three sub-problems sequentially till reaching convergence. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm can improve the network capacity by nearly two times than the Long Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-A).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".