MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Alteration of endothelial CaMKII in AngII‐induced hypertensive mice

2013· article· en· W3170984443 on OpenAlexafffund
Chimène Charbel, Fanny Toussaint, Alexandre Blanchette, Jonathan Ledoux

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCummings FoundationHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsStimulationNitric oxideReactive oxygen speciesEndocrinologyChemistryInternal medicineAngiotensin IIEndothelial dysfunctionIntracellularHomeostasisVasodilationCell biologyBiologyMedicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endothelial dysfunction found in AngII‐induced hypertension is characterized by an alteration of the delicate balance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO). Loss of endothelial Ca 2+ homeostasis has also been shown in hypertension. Recent evidences suggest that CaMKII is activated by Ca 2+ pulsars, a localized spontaneous Ca 2+ signal and is involved in endothelial function. Since CaMKII is also sensitive to intracellular ROS, endothelial CaMKII and Ca 2+ pulsars in an AngII‐induced hypertension mouse model was studied. Real‐time confocal imaging showed that acute exposure to AngII stimulated both Ca 2+ pulsars and production of ROS. As expected, an increase in endothelial ROS production was found with dihydroethidium (DHE) in the AngII hypertensive compared to normotensive mice. Moreover, AngII‐induced hypertension appears to recruit activated CaMKII (T286) at the myoendothelial projection (MEP), sites of Ca 2+ pulsars. Consistently, clustering of all endothelial CaMKII isoforms (α, β and δ) within the MEP has showed a similar distribution. Our data suggest that CaMKII activity is modulated by an increased ROS production and Ca 2+ pulsars stimulation in AngII‐induced hypertensive mice. Supported by CIHR, FRQS, CFI and HSFC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects→French-language works237,207→