MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3170989258 · doi:10.31582/rmag.mg.58.2.43

Stratigraphy and hydrocarbon resources of the San Juan Basin: Lessons for other basins, lessons from other basins

2021· article· en· W3170989258 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce S. Hart

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Mountain Geologist · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyStructural basinSedimentary depositional environmentCretaceousSource rockSedimentary basinPaleontologyPaleogeneSedimentary rockSedimentary basin analysisStratigraphyHydrocarbon explorationPetroleum reservoirBasin modellingTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the relationships between stratigraphy and hydrocarbon production from the San Juan Basin of New Mexico and Colorado. Abundant data and the long production history allow lessons to be learned, both from an exploration and development perspective, that can be applied in other basins. Conversely, as new play types and technologies are defined and developed elsewhere, the applicability of those tools in the San Juan Basin needs to be understood for well-informed exploration and development activities to continue. The San Juan Basin is a Latest Cretaceous – Tertiary (Paleogene) structure that contains rocks deposited from the Lower Paleozoic to the Tertiary, but only the Upper Cretaceous section has significant hydrocarbon, mostly gas, production. Herein I make the case for studying depositional systems, and the controls thereon (e.g., basin development, eustasy, sediment supply), because they are the first-order controls on whether a sedimentary basin can become a hydrocarbon province, or super basin as the San Juan Basin has recently been defined. Only in the Upper Cretaceous did a suitable combination of forcing mechanisms combine to form source and reservoir rocks, and repeated transgressive-regressive cycles of the Upper Cretaceous stacked multiple successions of source and reservoir rocks in a way that leads to stacked pay potential. Because of the types of depositional systems that could develop, the source rocks were primarily gas prone, like those of other Rocky Mountain basins. Oil-prone source rocks are present but primarily restricted to episodes of peak transgression. A lack of suitable trapping mechanisms helps to explain the relative dearth of conventional oil pools. Although gas production has dropped precipitously in the past decade, driven primarily by overabundance of gas supply associated with the shale-gas boom, the combination of horizontal drilling and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing is being applied to revive oil production from some unconventional stratigraphic targets with success.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Mountain GeologistSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207