MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171055425 · doi:10.4307/jsee.63.3_80

Development and Implementation of a Safety Consideration NC Machine Tool for Practical Education

2015· article· en· W3171055425 on OpenAlex
Shinichi Imai, Midori SHINTANI

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of JSEE · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Robotics and Engineering
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRisk analysis (engineering)Industrial engineeringEngineeringEngineering managementBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, studying material that accurately imitates the actual workplace might be an effective way to acquire practical skills. However, problems, such as inadequate study time, risk of accidents, and the cost of advanced study, emerge when such imitations are implemented. This paper develops education-oriented, NC machine tools, which facilitate studying material that accurately imitates what occurs in the real world, for use in introductory education in manufacturing. Therefore, students can acquire skills in such areas as problem solving and response methods to overcome the unforeseen problems unique to the actual workplace, and impossible to experience in simulations. Furthermore, this approach addresses the problems of previous approaches, such as constraints on manufacturing time, the risk of accidents, and high cost of study. Moreover, we also conducted classes to verify the effectiveness of tools developed for this learning approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it