Architecture & National Identity: The Judicial Precinct a Century in the Making
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Architecture & National Identity | The Judicial Precinct a Century in the Making examines the relationship between Canadian national identity and its association to architecture and place.Focusing on the architecture of the Capital Plateau, this thesis aims to understand Canadian identity in its 'elusiveness' and the signifi cant role that architecture and its particular location play in establishing and evoking a sense of identity.By understanding architecture's ability to become a symbol of identity, this research becomes the foundation for the design of the future Federal Courts of Canada.Currently missing an association to place, the courts and judicial system play a strong role in Canadian democratic identity.Respecting the heritage of urban planning as far back as 1912, this thesis provides a permanent home in the currently vacant west block of the Judicial Precinct.The design proposal deals with challenges such as location, context, function, security and identity while aiming to provide a project representative of its time, its history and a continuation of the 'Spirit of Place' of its location in the 'Heart of the Nation'.The design proposal focuses on the public image of the Federal Courts and attempts to reinforce a sense of identity through its location, by educating on the judicial system and by providing access-not currently available-to the public at large.It is an idealistic, almost utopian, proposal which aims to manifest our national values regarding how our judicial system should function (transparency, security, justice) as architecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".