MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Identifying Cytoplasmic and Nuclear C‐Terminal to LisH (CTLH) Complex Interactors Using High‐Throughput Proteomics

2021· article· en· W3171210114 on OpenAlexafffund
Gabriel Onea, Matthew E. R. Maitland, Gilles Lajoie, Caroline Schild‐Poulter

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTandem affinity purificationCytoplasmProteomicsNuclear proteinCell biologyBiologyCell fractionationUbiquitin ligaseSubcellular localizationCellular compartmentBiochemistryQuantitative proteomicsChemistryUbiquitinCellAffinity chromatographyGeneTranscription factorEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The C‐terminal to LisH (CTLH) complex is a tumour‐suppressive E3 Really Interesting New Gene (RING) ubiquitin ligase that regulates intracellular signaling pathways and maintains cellular homeostasis. It is comprised of 8 individual proteins that have been shown to mediate a variety of intracellular protein‐protein interactions; of these proteins, Required for Meiotic Division 5 Homolog A (RMND5A) and Macrophage Erythroblast Attacher (MAEA) contain the RING domains required for the CTLH complex to mediate ubiquitin transfer to specific protein substrates. Although its E3 ligase activity has been recently characterized, the endogenous subcellular localization of the complex and compartment‐specific protein interaction network – which encompasses many unidentified E3 ligase substrates – has not been identified. In this study, we hypothesized that the CTLH complex is present in the cytoplasm and nucleus, and that the CTLH complex mediates compartment‐specific protein‐protein interactions with cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins. To test this hypothesis, we used a chemical‐based subcellular fractionation method combined with low‐ and high‐throughput proteomics. We first optimized the chemical fractionation method and used Western blot to detect each endogenous CTLH complex member in HeLa cell cytoplasmic and nuclear protein extracts. We then identified compartment‐specific CTLH complex interactors using Affinity Purification Coupled to Mass Spectrometry (AP‐MS) using the main CTLH complex scaffold protein – Ran Binding Protein M (RanBPM) – as bait in cytoplasmic and nuclear HeLa protein extracts. Following Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Ionizing Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC‐ESI‐MS/MS) and subsequent in silico filtering using the MiST algorithm, we identified 27 cytoplasmic, 155 nuclear, and 31 nucleocytoplasmic high‐confidence (MiST Score ≥ 0.75) RanBPM interactors. STRING enrichment analysis of the high‐confidence interactors revealed that RanBPM and its associated CTLH complex may be involved in a variety of conserved Gene Ontology (GO) processes including Epigenetic Regulation of Gene Expression and Chromatin Assembly. As such, we validated a number of newly‐identified compartment‐specific RanBPM interactors associated with the enriched GO terms by co‐immunoprecipitation – using RanBPM as bait – and resulting Western blot. Furthermore, we focussed on an interesting novel putative interactor that is present in the two aforementioned GO processes – histone variant MacroH2A1 – and further validated its interaction with the CTLH complex in vivo using Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA), suggesting that this interaction may be physiologically relevant. Overall, by using this workflow, we identified and validated a number of novel compartment‐specific potential CTLH complex interactors in vitro , further validated a promising novel interaction between the CTLH complex and MacroH2A1 in vivo , and successfully implicated the CTLH complex in a number of previously unexplored cellular mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways→French-language works237,207→