MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Design Guidelines of Cost-Effective Support System for Industrial Reactors

2021· article· en· W3171226374 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Finite element methodPileEngineeringFoundation (evidence)Mechanism (biology)Construction engineeringSystems engineeringCivil engineeringMechanical engineeringComputer scienceStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the structural design aspects of support systems of industrial reactors. An overview of the geometric characteristics of vertical and horizontal reactors is presented. Finite element strategies to model the load transfer mechanism and soil/structure interactions are also described. Design parameters required for the foundation and pile supports are identified using various loading conditions. Design recommendations based on extensive analyses are proposed for vertical absorber stripper (VAS) and horizontal catalytic (HC) reactors. The proposed guidelines are cost-effective and can be utilized by engineers in practice to design the support system. The scope of the paper is limited to structural engineering design and construction aspects. The chemical and mechanical design aspects are not covered within the scope of this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it