Bibliographic record
Abstract
A screw micropile consists of a smooth shaft at the top, threaded shaft at the middle, and tapered shaft at the bottom. Research is required to investigate the axial behavior and capacities of this pile type in sand. A field load test program was performed on six types of full-scale screw micropiles installed at a sandpit site using torque. Selected piles were instrumented with axial strain gauges. A geotechnical investigation, including cone penetration tests (CPTs) and standard penetration tests, was undertaken. In total, 41 piles, including eight instrumented piles, were tested. The ultimate capacities and the unit shaft resistance distributions were determined. The shaft resistance was then compared with the tip resistance of CPT. The coefficient of lateral earth pressure and combined shaft resistance factor was determined for each pile segment, and then an effective stress method based on the combined shaft resistance factor was used to estimate the capacity of test piles. A theoretical torque model was developed using CPT sleeve friction; the model was verified by comparing the estimated torque to the measured torque of test piles. In the end, empirical torque factors were developed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".