MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3171340885 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab073.051

DOP12 Validation of a modified simple ultrasound activity Score for children with Crohn’s Disease

2021· article· en· W3171340885 on OpenAlexaffabout
H Ma, Daniela Migliarese Isaac, A Petrova, P Almeida, D Parsons, A Kuc, Matthew Carroll, Eytan Wine, H Huynh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCalprotectinCrohn's diseaseGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineUltrasoundUlcerative colitisRank correlationRectumColonoscopyDiseaseEndoscopyRadiologyColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Transabdominal bowel ultrasound (TABUS) is an ideal tool to assess the bowel wall thickness (BWT) of children with Crohn’s disease (CD) due to its minimal invasiveness. Recently the Simple Ultrasound Activity Score for CD (SUS-CD) was developed and validated in adults using the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD). Our aim was to determine how the SUS-CD performed in children at diagnosis in comparison to endoscopy. Methods Pediatric patients (0–18 years old) with suspected inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were prospectively enrolled through the Edmonton Pediatric IBD Clinic in Alberta, Canada. Patients underwent a baseline TABUS to visualize the intestine (excluding rectum, which is difficult to see with TABUS), blood work and endoscopy. The weighted pediatric CD activity index (wPCDAI) assessed disease activity, and SES-CD assessed endoscopic disease. Modified SUS-CD (excluding rectal sub score) was calculated using BWT scores (0=<3mm, 1=3–4.9mm, 2=5–7.9mm, 3=>8mm) and colour doppler scores (0=no or 1 vessel, 1=2–5 vessels, 2=>5 vessels per cm2) for each segment (terminal ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon) and compared to SES-CD. Modified SUS-CD was correlated to wPCDAI score, C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FCP). Using SPSS, anova and Chi square were used to assess for an association between TABUS parameters and wPCDAI. Spearman’s rank (rho) and Pearson’s correlation (r) were used to assess for a correlation between modified SUS-CD with SES-CD, wPCDAI, CRP and FCP. Results 40 patients recruited, 35 had CD (mean age 12.6(2.85)) and 5 were normal and scanned for suspected IBD (mean age 12.2(3.75)). Median wPCDAI and SES-CD scores for CD patients were 61(IQR 35.6–77.5) and 15(IQR 7.5–21) respectively. Fat proliferation was associated with severe CD based on wPCDAI (p<0.05). The modified SUS-CD score correlated well with the modified SES-CD score (rho=0.79,r=0.76,p<0.001,R2 linear=0.465). When the BWT threshold was lowered by 0.5mm for each BWT category, correlation improved (rho=0.80,r=0.82,p<0.001,R2 Linear=0.541). Using a similar lower threshold for BWT, a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.87 and 0.90 for detecting mild endoscopic activity and moderate endoscopic activity, respectively. There was a significant correlation between SUS-CD and wPCDAI score (r=0.56,p<0.01), CRP (r=0.55,p<0.01) and FCP (r=0.56,p<0.01). Conclusion Fat proliferation was associated with more severe CD. The modified SUS-CD correlated well with modified SES-CD score, wPCDAI, CRP and FCP. Correlation improved when BWT threshold in each category was dropped by 0.5mm. These data support the use of TABUS as an effective adjunct to the assessment of pediatric CD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→