MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171348742 · doi:10.1109/ner49283.2021.9441386

SSVEP Harmonic Fusion for Improved Visual Field Reconstruction with CNN

2021· article· en· W3171348742 on OpenAlex
Danson Evan Garcia, Kai Zheng, Steve Mann

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFusionComputer visionField (mathematics)VisualizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) occur due to a repetitive visual stimulus, which results in periodic responses from the visual cortex at the stimulus frequency and its harmonics. Prior studies show that the fundamental SSVEP frequency response can be used to produce a visual reconstruction of what is shown to the human eye. However, due to interference coming from the source and the sensing device, the resulting captured image contains salt-and-pepper noise and random value noise. This study investigates whether information present in the SSVEP harmonics is useful in denoising and enhancing the captured visual reconstruction. The proposed convolutional neural network architecture methods are compared against the SSVEP fundamental and naive additive reconstructions. The results show that combining harmonics and reconstructions from different signal processing methods into the neural network architecture enhances the resulting image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image Fusion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207