MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171388853 · doi:10.24252/qadauna.v2i2.19451

Pandangan Hukum Islam tentang Penerapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan di Perusahaan Listrik Negara Unit Induk Wilayah Sulselrabar

2021· article· id· W3171388853 on OpenAlexaff
Mir'ah Thania, Muhammad Jamal Jamil

Bibliographic record

VenueQadauna Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Keluarga Islam · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)WiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceManagementBusiness administrationSociologyBusinessEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstrakPokok permasalahan adalah Pandangan Hukum Islam tentang Penerapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan di Perusahaan Listrik Negara Unit Induk Wilayah Sulselrabar. Adapun sub masalah dibagi menjadi tiga bagian, yaitu: 1) Bagaimana Pandangan Hukum Islam tentang Penerapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan 2) Bagaimana Proses Penerapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan, 3) Apa faktor pendukung dan penghambat diterapkannya Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan di Perusahaan Listrik Negara Unit Induk Wilayah Sulselrabar. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian kualitatif deskriptif yaitu berupa penelitian lapangan (field research) dengan pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah Yuridis-Normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah dengan terbentuknya Tanggung Jawab Program Kemitraan dan Bina Lingkungan (PKBL) dan tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan saat ini dapat memberikan manfaat untuk masyarakat dan dapat berguna untuk jangka waktu yang panjang, salah satunya adalah PLN meringankan pembayaran listrik bagi masyarakat yang kurang mampu, memberikan bantuan-bantuan sosial seperti memberikan dana kepada masyarakat yang terkena covid, bantuan fasilitas sekolah, mesjid, panti asuhan serta dalam sektor perkebunan. Namun PLN tetap diberikan saran untuk selalu meningkatkan dan mengaitkan konsep pembangunan berkelanjutan guna menjamin kelangsungan hidup perusahaan dan masyarakat dengan selalu memperhatikan dan mengoptimalkan kinerja fungsi tugas masing-masing didalam perusahaan dan Memastikan tersedianya dan terlaksananya program pelestarian alam termasuk penghijauan dan upaya pengembangan citra perusahaan sesuai dengan Prinsip Good Corporate Governance. Kata Kunci: Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Lingkungan, PLN SulselrabarAbstractThe main problem of this investigation is the View of Islamic Law on the Implementation of Social and Environmental Responsibility in the State Electricity Company in the Regional Main Unit of South Sulawesi. The sub-problems are divided into three parts, namely: 1) How is the View of Islamic Law on the Application of Social and Environmental Responsibility 2) How is the Process of Implementing Social and Environmental Responsibility, 3) What are the supporting and inhibiting factors for the implementation of Social and Environmental Responsibility in the Electric Company Parent State Unit for South Sulawesi Region. This type of research uses descriptive qualitative research in the form of a field (field research) with the research approach used is Juridical-Normative. The results of this research are the formation of the Partnership and Community Development Program Responsibility (PKBL) and current corporate social responsibility can provide benefits to the community and can be used for a long period of time, one of which is PLN easing electricity payments for less fortunate people. , providing social assistance such as providing funds to people affected by Covid, assistance with school facilities, mosques, orphanages and in the plantation sector. However, PLN still provides advice to always improve and link the concept of sustainable development for the survival of the company and the community by always paying attention to and optimizing the performance of each company's task function and ensuring the availability and implementation of nature conservation programs including greening and efforts to develop the company's image in accordance with the Principles Good Corporate GovernanceKeywords : coorporate sosial responbility, governance

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQadauna Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Keluarga IslamSame topicLegal Studies and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207