Manifestation of Shklovsky’s Defamiliarization and Derredian Différance in the Poetry of Keats and Sipihri
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It seems that there is a demonstration of Shklovsky’s defamiliarization in some of Keats’s and Sipihri’s poems; in them they tried to avoid the traditional logics and conventional ways of looking at the world in order to make difference in the locus of their observations. Amazingly, the function of these differences or contrasts can transparently be equated and aligned to what Derrida asserted as differance or to differ and defer. However, these dualistic ways of looking at the world, pave the way for new artistic perceptions which are not revealed promptly, instead, challenge and penetrate the reader’s mind to discover them. Considering such a perspective in mind, this article is to foreground the manifestation of these terms in some of the poems by Keats and Sipihri which does not seem to have received a significant attention by the researchers. The authors of this paper believe that the essence or the motifs in most of the artistic works of these two poets respond to a dualistic notion which is – or might be – an ongoing process in literary criticism. Key words : Keats; Sipihri; Differance;Defamilirization; Contrast; Dualism
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".