MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171426535 · doi:10.7939/r3-19h7-yd08

A 3-D Magnetotelluric Study of the Slave Craton Lithosphere, NW Canada

2020· article· en· W3171426535 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sean Bettac

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetotelluricsCratonLithosphereGeologySeismologyGeophysicsTectonicsElectrical resistivity and conductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Archean cratons are comprised of thick, stable continental lithosphere that has persisted for billions of years owing to their isopycnicity (i.e. near neutral buoyancy) and higher viscosity than the surrounding mantle. These regions host diamonds at depths greater than 150 km due to the relatively cold temperatures found in the depth range where pressure is high enough for diamonds to be stable. Because of this, understanding the deep structure of cratonic lithosphere is important for regional diamond exploration. In this thesis previously collected magnetotelluric (MT) data were used to produce a 3-D resistivity model of the Slave craton's lithosphere. The resolution of this resistivity model was rigorously tested. Important features of the model and their implications include: (1) A region of low resistivity (< 10 Ωm) at a depth of 100 km beneath the Lac de Gras kimberlite field in the central Slave craton, which was interpreted as a layer of high density saline fluids that were emplaced from a Mesozoic subduction event. Phlogopite and grain boundary sulphides also remain as possible interpretations for the cause of the low resistivity (< 10 Ωm). However, none of these proposed interpretations are without their flaws. Fluids in the mantle would be positively buoyant and reactive suggesting that it would be difficult to retain fluids from the Mesozoic over long time periods. Large quantities of phlogopite would be required (> 20% volume fraction) to produce the low resistivity observed (< 10 Ωm), which is not strongly supported by observations in xenoliths and there is little experimental work on grain boundary sulphides in the mantle. This region of low resistivity was previously observed at depths of 80 - 120 km by Jones et al. (2003). Previous interpretations of this conductor invoked graphite films as an explanation, but it is unlikely that graphite films are stable at these depths. The spatial correlation between the low resistivity layer and the Lac de Gras kimberlite field could be the result of kimberlite magmas following zones of weakness in the lithosphere as a result of the metasomatism caused by the slab-derived fluids. (2) The resistivity model also showed that beneath the entire Slave craton the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB) is at a depth of at least 200 km. Determining the depth to the LAB is important as this can determine the size of the diamond stability field within the lithosphere, which is used in regional diamond targeting. (3) The upper mantle resistivity can be interpreted as requiring a low water content on the order of 10 - 150 ppm by weight in the depth range 100 -170 km. Below these depths the lithosphere appears to be dry (< 5 ppm). The dry base of the lithosphere may act as a resistant boundary preventing the cratonic root from being eroded by the underlying asthenosphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.147
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207