Substituting Convolutions for Neural Network Compression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many practitioners would like to deploy deep, convolutional neural networks in memory-limited scenarios, e.g., on an embedded device. However, with an abundance of compression techniques available it is not obvious how to proceed; many bring with them additional hyperparameter tuning, and are specific to particular network types. In this paper, we propose a simple compression technique that is general, easy to apply, and requires minimal tuning. Given a large, trained network, we propose (i) substituting its expensive convolutions with cheap alternatives, leaving the overall architecture unchanged; (ii) treating this new network as a student and training it with the original as a teacher through distillation. We demonstrate this approach separately for (i) networks predominantly consisting of full 3 ×3 convolutions and (ii) 1 ×1 or pointwise convolutions which together make up the vast majority of contemporary networks. We are able to leverage a number of methods that have been developed as efficient alternatives to fully-connected layers for pointwise substitution, allowing us provide Pareto-optimal benefits in efficiency/accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".