MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171457687 · doi:10.29303/jcar.v1i2.781

Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Materi Agribisnis Pengolahan Hasil Nabati Kelas XII SMKN 1 Sakra

2019· article· id· W3171457687 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Classroom Action Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSTEM Education
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Untuk mengetahui peningkatan hasil belajar siswa kelas XI SMKN 1 Sakra pada materi pengolahan hasil nabati dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian tindakan kelas yang dilaksanakan di SMKN 1 Sakra yang terdiri dari dua siklus dimana tiap siklus meliputi 4 tahap yaitu perencanaan, pelaksanaan tindakan, pengamatan dan refleksi. Data yang digunakan adalah hasil belajar siswa, hasil observasi guru dan hasil observasi siswa. Sabjek penelitian ini adalah ini adalah siswa kelas XII SMKN 1 Sakra yang berjumlah 30 orang. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa model pembelajaran berbasis masalah mampu mendorong pemikiran siswa untuk berkembang dnegan cepat dimana aktivitas yang mendukung proses belajar mengajar terus mengalami peningkatan dan aktivitas yang tidak relevan dengan kegiatan proses belajar mengajar berkurang dari pertemuan kepertemuan berikutnya. Berdasarkan hal ini maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa penerapan odel pembelajaran berbasis masalah dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik pada materi pengolahan hasil nabati

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it