Adolescent Pregnancy in Bangladesh: Understanding Care-Seeking Behaviour and Practices to Advance Responsive Antenatal Care and Nutrition Services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compared to pregnant women, pregnant adolescents in Bangladesh are less likely to utilize maternal health services. The objective of this study was to explore their experiences of seeking, accessing, and navigating antenatal care (ANC) and nutrition services in Bangladesh. Peer-interviewers (age 17–20 yrs) in Dhaka and Rangpur obtained informed consent and interviewed respondents (n = 192): adolescents who were pregnant or had a child under 1 year, family members, and healthcare providers. Questions explored barriers and enablers to ANC access, interactions with the healthcare system, micronutrient supplementation, dietary practices, nutrition advice given by healthcare providers, and adolescents’ agency and decision-making. Qualitative research methods were used: transcripts were anonymized, coded (ensuring intercoder reliability), and analyzed thematically. Respondents felt that adolescent childbearing was risky and additional support was required. Cost was perceived as the greatest barrier to nutrition and healthcare including supplements, ultrasounds, and facility-based care, despite some availability of subsidized or free services. Pregnant adolescents were accompanied by family members to health facilities, sometimes only seeking care for emergencies. Nutrition advice given by healthcare providers did not always align with traditional practices, although they were a trusted source of medical information. Supplements were mostly received after first trimester. Some pregnant adolescents reported receiving generic nutrition advice from healthcare providers but seldom had a chance to ask questions and felt a lack of respect. Quality of care was perceived to vary widely from one healthcare provider to the next. This study provides unique insights into the experience of pregnant adolescents in Bangladesh and their interface with the healthcare system, laying a foundation for tailoring nutrition and ANC guidelines specifically for them. As experiences were influenced by social norms, limited agency, and family decision-making, healthcare providers should be equipped with behavior change communication skills specifically for pregnant adolescents to ensure they receive quality gender-responsive, youth-friendly health and nutrition services. Global Affairs Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".