MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171532427 · doi:10.18174/548327

Integraal sturen op doelen voor duurzame landbouw via KPI’s

2021· report· nl· W3171532427 on OpenAlexaff
Anne van Doorn, J.W. Reijs, Jan Willem Erisman, Frank Verhoeven, Daan Verstand, Wouter de Jong, K. Andeweg, N.J.M. van Eekeren, Anne Charlotte Hoes, Heleen van Kernebeek, Chris Koopmans, Jan Paul Wagenaar, Pieter de Wolf

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languagenl
FieldEngineering
TopicSustainable Building Design and Assessment
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deze notitie is bedoeld als achtergrondstuk voor beleidsmakers, betrokkenen bij experimenteergebieden en andere stakeholders die aan de slag zijn met de ontwikkeling van Kritische Prestatie Indicatoren (KPI’s) voor duurzame kringlooplandbouw. De notitie biedt een gezamenlijk kader voor deze ontwikkeling. Een gezamenlijk kader is belangrijk doordat aan de vergader- en keukentafels verschillende beelden en verwachtingen ontstaan over de ontwikkeling van een KPI-systematiek voor kringlooplandbouw, wat de samenwerking in de weg kan staan. Deze notitie geeft daarom richting aan de verdere ontwikkeling en toepassing van een KPI-systematiek voor kringlooplandbouw.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSustainable Building Design and AssessmentFrench-language works237,207