Clicking a Collaborative Path: Exploring What (re)Conciliation Can Look Like in <i>Inheritance: a pick-the-path experience</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article part d’un entretien avec des membres de l’équipe de création du spectacle Inheritance : a pick-the-path experience, présenté par les compagnies Alley Theatre et Touchstone Theatre, en collaboration avec le Vancouver Moving Theatre et le Centre d’amitié autochtone de Vancouver. Inheritance propose au public d’explorer les dynamiques sous-jacentes à la (ré)conciliation en choisissant comment se déroulera sur scène un récit où la souveraineté des Autochtones sur le territoire s’oppose au privilège des colons dans une cabane isolée en Colombie-Britannique. La personne qui mène les entretiens découvre la genèse du projet et son développement, et on lui explique comment la participation du public détermine le déroulement de l’intrigue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".