O relato de vida indígena e outros (sub)gêneros literários em A queda do céu: palavras de um xamã yanomami, Meu nome é Rigoberta Menchu e assim nasceu minha consciência e Bobbi Lee: Indian Rebel struggles of a Native Canadian woman
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partindo de três obras primárias: A queda do céu: palavras de um xamã yanomami, de Davi Kopenawa e Bruce Albert, Meu nome é Rigoberta Menchú e assim nasceu minha consciência, de Rigoberta Menchú e Elizabeth Burgos, e Bobbi Lee: Indian Rebel Struggles of a Native Canadian Woman, de Lee Maracle e Don Barnett, busco apontar e reforçar algumas das características desses relatos de vida indígena (SALLES, 2020) a partir de uma análise comparativa com outros gêneros (a saber, narrativas de vida étnica, narrativas de exílio, autoetnografia e ecobiografia). Para tal, a “virada etnográfica” ocorrida no campo das ciências sociais, que trouxe maior fluidez para a classificação de trabalhos como relatos de vida indígena, assim como a discussão sobre gêneros literários nos são bastante caras nesse artigo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".