Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe emerged at the confluence of two developments. Since the early 1950s, the USSR and Poland had demanded internationally sanctioned security arrangements against the rise of a rearmed West Germany by way of legal recognition of their contested post-World War II borders. In comparison, the European Communities wanted to overcome the legacy of the war through the guarantee of human rights throughout all of Europe. This conflict between the Communist focus on the supremacy of statehood and the Western emphasis on individual rights came to a denouement at the CSCE in 1972-75. The Socialist Camp did not receive a legal guarantee of its borders, while it had to concede on human rights. Yet the impact of human rights on the European Socialist Camp, which Western European governments had expected for the period afterwards, did not happen immediately. Poland would ultimately receive a guarantee for its post-war borders after the end of the Cold War in 1989/91. But the Final Act of the CSCE neither prevented the suppression of human rights in the Socialist Camp until the late 1980s nor saved the GDR from collapse and absorption into the FRG by 1990.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".