The helicity uniqueness conjecture in 3d hydrodynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We prove that the helicity is the only regular Casimir function for the coadjoint action of the volume-preserving diffeomorphism group SDiff ( M ) \text {SDiff}(M) on smooth exact divergence-free vector fields on a closed three-dimensional manifold M M . More precisely, any regular C 1 C^1 functional defined on the space of C ∞ C^\infty (more generally, C k C^k , k ≥ 4 k\ge 4 ) exact divergence-free vector fields and invariant under arbitrary volume-preserving diffeomorphisms can be expressed as a C 1 C^1 function of the helicity. This gives a complete description of Casimirs for adjoint and coadjoint actions of SDiff ( M ) \text {SDiff}(M) in 3D and completes the proof of Arnold-Khesin’s 1998 conjecture for a manifold M M with trivial first homology group. Our proofs make use of various tools from the theory of dynamical systems, including normal forms for divergence-free vector fields, the Poincaré-Birkhoff theorem, and a division lemma for vector fields with hyperbolic zeros.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".