MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171674128 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzab035_048

OPREVENT2 Community Action Component to Promote Healthy Policy, Systems, and Environments With Native American Communities: Process Evaluation and Lessons Learned

2021· article· en· W3171674128 on OpenAlexaff
Brittany Jock, Joel Gittelsohn

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCommunity Health and Development
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionStakeholderGeneral partnershipParticipatory action researchStakeholder engagementCommunity engagementIntervention (counseling)Community-based participatory researchSustainabilityFidelityMedical educationPublic relationsMedicinePsychologyPolitical scienceNursingEngineeringSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To assess the implementation of the Community Action Component (CAC) of OPREVENT2, which aimed to promote healthy food and physical activity policies, systems, and environments (PSE) with six Native American communities. OPREVENT2 examined the impact of a multi-level, multi-component obesity prevention intervention in six tribal communities in the Southwest and Midwest regions of the US (Three randomly selected to receive the intervention first, three to receive second). The CAC was designed to identify and develop PSE changes in partnership with community partners. We developed the following implementation standards prior to the intervention: we aimed to hold monthly meetings that were ≥1 hour and recruited ≥10 participants representing different stakeholder groups (health staff, store employee, tribal leader, school teachers/staff, and community members). We used measures of frequency to evaluate the extent that we met established reach, dose delivered, and fidelity standards. CAC meetings used participatory approaches to discuss ways to use PSE changes to encourage healthy eating and physical activity in stores, schools, worksites, and communities. Overall, we achieved high dose delivered; we held one monthly meeting on average that ranged 60–120 minutes. Reach varied by community; on average we attained 64%, 101%, 479% of the participants. Meetings were attended most often by community members, health staff, and tribal leaders, with low participation from store employees or school teachers/staff. Whenever possible, CAC meetings were planned with existing meetings to enhance reach to encourage sustainability and enable collaboration with community partners. Future interventions could develop a tribal council resolution to encourage other stakeholder groups to attend and promote sustainability of intersectoral work at an earlier stage. Assessing community readiness could assist in developing strategies to promote PSE changes that are tailored to each community. The inclusion of CAC complements community-based obesity prevention strategies in Native American communities and can achieve moderate to high reach, dose-delivered, and fidelity. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.064
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0640.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.277
GPT teacher head0.529
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicCommunity Health and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207