Spatial Super Resolution of Real-World Aerial Images for Image-Based Plant Phenotyping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imaging is a promising data acquisition technique for image-based plant phenotyping. However, UAV images have a lower spatial resolution than similarly equipped in field ground-based vehicle systems, such as carts, because of their distance from the crop canopy, which can be particularly problematic for measuring small-sized plant features. In this study, the performance of three deep learning-based super resolution models, employed as a pre-processing tool to enhance the spatial resolution of low resolution images of three different kinds of crops were evaluated. To train a super resolution model, aerial images employing two separate sensors co-mounted on a UAV flown over lentil, wheat and canola breeding trials were collected. A software workflow to pre-process and align real-world low resolution and high-resolution images and use them as inputs and targets for training super resolution models was created. To demonstrate the effectiveness of real-world images, three different experiments employing synthetic images, manually downsampled high resolution images, or real-world low resolution images as input to the models were conducted. The performance of the super resolution models demonstrates that the models trained with synthetic images cannot generalize to real-world images and fail to reproduce comparable images with the targets. However, the same models trained with real-world datasets can reconstruct higher-fidelity outputs, which are better suited for measuring plant phenotypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".