Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intensive Care Research: Science to Practice, and from Bedside to Bench in critically ill patients.For example, the finding of ventilatorinduced lung injury made in animal models with high tidal volumes was successfully translated into protective ventilation guidelines at bedside practice and saved hundreds of thousands of critically ill patients worldwide.Clinical research on therapeutic and preventive interventions is largely based on the appropriate methodology to minimize random and systematic errors, the interplay of medical prognosis and patient autonomy, and the clinical risks and patient safety in a clinical research setting.Comprehensive high-quality research results will provide the right format for the decision maker and eventually be implemented toward patient care.In response to pandemic like the COVID-19, the need for high-quality basic and clinical research is greater and sounder now than ever.Input from experts in the fields dedicated to translating scientific research from bench to bedside and back is the mission of the Intensive Care Research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.182 | 0.295 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.063 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.037 | 0.033 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.020 |
| Research integrity | 0.020 | 0.036 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".