MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171750177 · doi:10.15520/sslej.v6i04.2787

On Trumpianism: Why did 70 Million Americans Still Vote for Trump after They Knew What He was like?

2021· article· en· W3171750177 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul T E Cusack

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Science Learning Education Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPopulism, Right-Wing Movements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)CruiseHistoryDemographyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Political scienceMedicineSociologyEngineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I live in a small city that, up until the COVID-19- was visited by a quarter of million visitors, mainly Americans, mainly New Yorkers, every year.  While I was walking on a waterfront pedway, I started up a conservation with an older gentleman and his son.  After the son questioned where all the port rats were (we have none), he referred to the American Blacks as “negros”. I was told by the father that they have a lot of thievery on board the cruise ships, perpetuated by the Blacks- their countrymen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Science Learning Education JournalSame topicPopulism, Right-Wing MovementsFrench-language works237,207