MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identifying Critical Periods of Neurotoxicity to Fluoride Exposure in Canadian Children

2020· article· en· W3171770399 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFluoride Effects and Removal
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluorideMedicinePregnancyPediatricsIntelligence quotientWechsler Adult Intelligence ScaleCohort studyCohortUrineInternal medicinePsychiatryCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Fluoride is associated with IQ deficits during early brain development, but the period in which children are most vulnerable has not been established. We assessed sex-specific effects of fluoride on IQ across prenatal, infancy, and early childhood windows. Methods: Repeated exposures from 596 mother-child pairs in the Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals cohort were analyzed using GEE to explore associations between fluoride exposures and IQ after adjustment for covariates and multiple comparisons. Fluoride was measured in urine spot samples collected during pregnancy trimesters and when children were between 1.9 and 4.4 years. Infant fluoride exposure was estimated from water fluoride concentration and duration of formula-feeding over the first year of life. The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-III was administered at 3 to 4 years. Results: Among boys and girls, the association between fluoride and performance IQ (PIQ) significantly differed across exposure windows (p = .01). Among boys, prenatal exposure to fluoride was most strongly associated with adverse deficits on PIQ, B = -8.45 (95% CI: -12.90, -3.99), followed by infancy, B = -2.81 (95% CI: -6.59, 0.98), but not childhood, B = 0.20 (95% CI: -2.58, 2.99), respectively. Among girls, infancy exposure to fluoride was most strongly associated with adverse deficits on PIQ, B= -5.19 (95% CI: -8.84, -1.53), followed by prenatal and childhood exposures, B = -3.50 (95% CI: -9.51, 2.51), B = -2.05 (95% CI: -2.58, 2.99), respectively. Estimates for full-scale IQ were weaker but showed strongest effects for boys in the prenatal exposure period. Effects across all windows were nonsignificant among girls. We found no significant sex-specific associations between fluoride and verbal IQ. Conclusion: Adverse associations between fluoride exposures and cognitive outcomes may depend on timing and biological sex, with the prenatal window potentially critical for boys, while infancy is potentially critical for girls. Keywords: Fluoride, critical windows, water quality, children’s neuropsychology, epidemiology, toxicology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it