MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171770674 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noab090.162

RARE-01. ASSESSING THE SYMPTOM DIAGNOSTIC INTERVAL FOR CHILDREN WITH CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TUMOURS

2021· article· en· W3171770674 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cameron Crowell, Bruce Crooks, Simon Walling, Kelly Boileau, Lynette Bowes, Robert Rutledge, Ketan Kulkarni, Daniel McNeely, Craig Erker

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreJaneway Children's Health and Rehabilitation CentreMemorial University of NewfoundlandIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedulloblastomaEpendymomaVomitingNauseaGliomaRetrospective cohort studyPediatricsInternal medicineSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Diagnostic delays in pediatric neuro-oncology is a subject of distress for families and providers. We aimed to evaluate the symptom diagnostic interval (SDI) and influencing variables for children with CNS tumors. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 210 patients diagnosed from 2001–2018 and managed at the tertiary care facility in Halifax, Canada. SDI was defined as time from first symptom until tissue diagnosis or, if not available, imaging diagnosis. Non-parametric tests were used to compare SDI between groups. Results Median SDI was 12.4 weeks (IQR 4.3–30), longer than 7 other studies of 1308 children reporting medians of 4.5–10 weeks (p < 0.01). Most common tumors and their median SDI included low-grade glioma (LGG) (n=97, 46%; 17.9 weeks), medulloblastoma (n=31, 15%; 8.7 weeks), high-grade glioma (HGG) and DIPG (n=23, 11%; 5.6 weeks), and ependymoma (n=13, 6%; 13.6 weeks). The most common initial reported symptom included headache (n=63; 30%), nausea/vomiting (n=27, 18%), seizure (n=24, 12%), and visual impairment (n=13, 6.3%). Patients aged 0–3 years had a shorter SDI than patients 10 years and older (SDI 8.7 vs 14.6 weeks; p = 0.03). Tumor category showed longer SDI for LGG versus HGG (p = 0.003), DIPG (p = 0.02), medulloblastoma (p = 0.03) and other embryonal tumors (p = 0.03). Longer SDI was not associated with increased risk of disease progression for LGG (p = 0.93), medulloblastoma (p = 0.89), or ependymoma (p = 0.5). No difference in SDI was found with regard to diagnosis era, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or distance to the tertiary care facility. Conclusion SDI at our centre is longer than previously reported studies. SDI is linked to tumor biology and its relevance within specific tumor groups deserves further investigation given it doesn’t appear to predict tumor progression/recurrence, yet families and providers feel distress when delays in diagnosis are perceived.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207