MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171880319 · doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.666722

Innovation Through Heterochrony: An Amphioxus Perspective on Telencephalon Origin and Function

2021· article· en· W3171880319 on OpenAlexaff
Thurston C. Lacalli

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Ecology and Evolution · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeterochronyBiologyChordateCerebrumMetamorphosisEvolutionary biologyVertebrateLarvaEvolutionary developmental biologyFunction (biology)AnatomyZoologyVentral nerve cordNeuroscienceOntogenyEcologyNervous systemGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heterochrony has played a key role in the evolution of invertebrate larval types, producing “head larvae” in diverse taxa, where anterior structures are accelerated and specialized at the expense of more caudal ones. For chordates, judging from amphioxus, the pattern has been more one of repeated acceleration of adult features so that they function earlier in development, thus converting the ancestral larva, whether it was a head larva or not, into something progressively more chordate-like. Recent molecular data on gene expression patterns in the anterior nerve cord of amphioxus point to a similar process being involved in the origin of the telencephalon. As vertebrates evolved, a combination of acceleration and increasing egg size appears here to have allowed the development of a structure that would originally have emerged only gradually in the post-embryonic phase of the life history to be compressed into embryogenesis. The question then is what, in functional terms, makes the telencephalon so important to the survival of post-embryonic ancestral vertebrates that this was adaptively advantageous. A better understanding of the function this brain region performs in amphioxus may help provide the answer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Ecology and EvolutionSame topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchFrench-language works237,207