Rapid visual field progression in a patient with glaucoma as the presenting manifestation of sarcoidosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report a case of accelerated visual field progression secondary to a new orbital apex lesion in a patient with a longstanding history of fatigue and cough. OBSERVATIONS: A 73-year-old myopic female with known open angle glaucoma presented with accelerated unilateral visual field progression. Maximally tolerated medical therapy was instituted over a period of 1-2 years with imminent discussions of surgical intervention. Around this time the patient reported worsening cough and fatigue, which were initially attributed to glaucoma medication side effects. Consideration of the patient's remote history of melanoma and the current asymmetry of the visual field progression triggered a computerized tomography (CT) scan of the orbits as part of the management. An orbital apex lesion was discovered, raising suspicion for metastatic melanoma, and restaging CT imaging uncovered renal, hepatic, and mediastinal masses. Unexpectedly, biopsies revealed non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammatory processes consistent with a diagnosis of sarcoidosis. It is perhaps noteworthy that the patient had received interferon therapy for management of her melanoma; previous reports have associated interferon exposure with subsequent sarcoid disease, regardless of duration of therapy or elapsed time since exposure. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Although rare, sarcoidosis can occur virtually anywhere in the body, including the orbital apex. Its common early symptoms, fatigue and cough, are insidious and seen frequently in this patient's age group and medication side effect profile. It is important to maintain an appropriate index of suspicion when monitoring atypical visual field progression in a patient with glaucoma. In this case, imaging, subsequent biopsy, and a multi-specialty team were integral to this patient's diagnosis and management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".