MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171916351 · doi:10.32870/punto.v1i1.4

Inocencia, luz y muerte, La suma de las edades

2015· article· es· W3171916351 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Carlos Reyes García

Bibliographic record

VenuePunto CUNORTE · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Treatments and Disorders
Canadian institutionsNorthern Teacher Education Program
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

¿Por qué esperamos recordar todo? ¿Por qué olvidamos lo que nos ha marcado: inocencia, juegos, lágrimas y silencios? Es el olvido la condena que el tiempo nos impone? El remedio contra esa sentencia sería con certeza atesorar en fragmentos de memoria pequeñas piezas de un todo que a su vez repliquen en formas, sonidos, momentos pausados, sin aliento. ¿Dónde huyen esos instantes cuando la cordura parece hacerse polvo? Y si eso es todo lo que existe? Un gran sorbo que asemeja la vida, para todo, para la eternidad misma que devoramos, aún para ello hay tiempo, la mente recorre laberintos interminables. Busco, busco tocando sin mirar atrás.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePunto CUNORTESame topicPsychological Treatments and DisordersFrench-language works237,207