MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171973853 · doi:10.1111/php.13472

Photochemical Valence Isomerization to High Energy Products—Bicyclobutanes and Oxabicyclobutanes<sup>†</sup>

2021· article· en· W3171973853 on OpenAlexaff
Anita Rágyanszki, Béla Fiser, Edward Lee‐Ruff, Joel F. Liebman

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotochemistry and Photobiology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsomerizationValence (chemistry)PhotochemistryHigh energyChemistryPhysicsAtomic physicsOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DFT calculations were used to determine the structures and energies of bicyclobutane and oxabicyclobutane as valence isomers derived from electronic excitation of their corresponding precursors, 1,3-butadiene and acrolein, respectively. Proton affinities of these strained compounds were determined and compared with their simple ring components, cyclopropane and ethylene oxide. The basicity as determined from proton affinities showed that bicyclobutane is the most basic saturated hydrocarbon, even more basic than oxabicyclobutane. Strain energies of these valence tautomers were computed which showed oxabicyclobutane to be significantly more strained than bicyclobutane. Qualitative reasons are provided to account for the difference in strain energies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhotochemistry and PhotobiologySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207