MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3171985138 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-15106

SiDroForest  Siberian Drone-mapped Forest inventory

2021· article· en· W3171985138 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Femke van Geffen, Birgit Heim, Ulrike Herzschuh, Luidmila A. Pestryakova, Evgenii S. Zakharov, Ronny Hänsch, Begüm Demir, Birgit Kleinschmit, Michael Förster, Stefan Kruse

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvergreenVegetation (pathology)Climate changeAlbedo (alchemy)BorealTaigaEnvironmental sciencePhysical geographyClimatologyGeographyLatitudeTemperate climateSnowForestryEcologyOceanographyMeteorologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To gain a better understanding of global carbon storage and albedo feedback mechanisms it is important to have insights into high latitude vegetation change. Boreal forest compositions are changing in response to changes in climate, which in turn can lead to feedbacks in regional and global climate through altered carbon cycles and albedo dynamics. Circumpolar boreal forests represent close to 30% of all forested area on the planet, between 900 and 1,200 million ha. These forests are located primarily in Alaska, Canada, and Russia. Due to the remote location of these forests and the short seasons without snow, data collected on the boreal vegetation is limited. The proposed dataset is an attempt to remedy data scarcity whilst providing adjusted data for machine learning practices.We present a dataset containing diverse formats of forest structure information that covers two important vegetation transition zones in Siberia: the Evergreen - Summergreen transition zone in Central Yakutia and the northern treeline in Chukotka (NE Siberia). This dataset contains data from the locations covered by fieldwork was performed by the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine research, (AWI) and the North-Eastern Federal University of Yakutsk​ (NEFU). The fieldwork upscaled through the addition of Red Green Blue(RGB) UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) camera data and Sentinel-2 satellite data cropped to a 5 km radius around the fieldwork sites. The dataset is created with the aim of providing ground truth validation and training data to be used in various vegetation related machine learning tasks . The dataset contains: 1.Labelled individual trees per 30x30 m plot assigned in field work with additional data on species, height, crown width, and biomass. 2.Structure from Motion (SfM)point clouds that provide 3D information about the forest structure, included generated Canopy Height Model (CHM), Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and a Digital Surface Model (DSM) per 50x50 m. 3.Multispectral Sentinel-2 satellite data (10 m ) cropped to a 5km radius with generated a NDVI(normalized difference vegetation index), available in three seasons: Early Summer, Peak Summer and Late Summer. 4.Extracted tree crowns with species information and a synthetically generated large (10.000 samples) dataset for training machine leaning algorithms. The dataset will be made publicly available on the data repository PANGAEA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→