A New Global Solver for Transmission Expansion Planning With AC Network Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To design a reliable and secure power system, it is necessary to have enough transmission capacity. The solution of transmission expansion planning (TEP) problem determines cost-optimal investment in future transmission equipment. In this paper, we propose a new global solver, named Global-TEP, for the TEP problem with an AC network representation (ACTEP), which is a mixed-integer nonlinear programming problem. The proposed solver is based on second-order cone relaxation, enhanced relaxation tightening constraints, and optimization-based/feasibility-based bound tightening techniques. Multiple enhanced relaxation tightening constraints are incorporated into the mixed-integer second-order cone relaxation of TEP in order to obtain a very strong relaxation as the lower bounding problem. In addition, a novel feasibility-based bound tightening technique is proposed to tighten the bounds of decision variables in a considerably short runtime. Finally, introducing a novel application of optimization-based bound tightening technique, Global-TEP is constructed that can solve the ACTEP problem efficiently with a guaranteed optimality gap. As illustrated by numerical case studies, Global-TEP is more scalable, more flexible, and much faster than the available global solvers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it