The evaluation of deficits on dynamic postural sway control and its correlation with lumbar mobility in females with chronic low back pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:1; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-format:other; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;} @font-face {font-family:"B Zar"; panose-1:0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; mso-font-charset:178; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:8193 -2147483648 8 0 64 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:right; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; direction:rtl; unicode-bidi:embed; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;} p.abst, li.abst, div.abst {mso-style-name:abst; mso-style-unhide:no; margin-top:3.0pt; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:0cm; margin-left:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; direction:rtl; unicode-bidi:embed; font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-family:"B Zar";} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; font-size:10.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;} @page Section1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> Introduction: Previous studies on chronic low back pain (CLBP) have addressed the biomechanical performance of trunk, including its mobility, and the static balance performance in the related population. However, the onset of low back pain is commonly linked with dynamic activities and therefore, the evaluation of the balance performance in dynamic condition would be clinically important. The objectives of this study were to assess the dynamic postural control and its relationship with trunk mobility in chronic low back pain patients. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four female patients with chronic low back pain and 24 able-bodied females, all between 25 to 45 years old, voluntarily participated in this study. Dynamic postural control, lumbar mobility and back pain were measured by a Biodex system, Schober technique and Quebec questionnaire, respectively. Multivariate analysis of variance (repeated measure) and Pearson correlation coefficient were used for data analysis (α < 0.05). Results: Chronic low back pain patients had greater dynamic postural sway (P < 0.0001). In chronic low back pain, the function of lower limbs and the trunk’s proprioception were affected. This deficit was better observed in closed eyes condition. Lumbar mobility was significantly reduced in chronic low back pain group, However there was no significant relationship between the lumbar mobility and the postural control (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Chronic low back pain is associated with greater postural sway and reduced lumbar mobility. These variables are independent and should be considered in both detection and treatment process separately. More studies are sequined to determine if these parameters are primary or secondary
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".