Bibliographic record
Abstract
The importance of the CRT and its expiring flood control provisions can be appreciated only with a basic understanding of the CRT.This Part discusses who implements the treaty for each country, the primary goals and considerations of the treaty, what the Canadian Entitlement is and why it is important, how the CRT determines power benefits, the CRT's termination articles, and the consequences if the United States terminates the CRT. A. Treaty EntitiesThe CRT calls for two entities, one from each country, to carry out the treaty.6 The United States chose the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the Northwest Division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to work in tandem as the U.S. treaty entity.7 Canada selected the Province of British Columbia, through BC Hydro, as its treaty entity.8 In addition to carrying out the treaty on behalf of their countries, the entities also offer recommendations on operating and modifying the CRT. 9 However, neither entity may terminate the CRT. 10 The power to terminate the CRT lies solely with the entities' respective governments.11 5 A ratepayer is "one who pays for a utility service and especially electricity according to established rates."Ratepayer,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".